F. Council consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award a contract to Gulf Coast Electric Co., Inc. of Beaumont, TX, and execute Change Order No. 1 for the Rue Street Lift Station Electrical and Controls Improvements Project.

[F. Council consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award a contract to Gulf Coast Electric Co., Inc. of Beaumont, TX, and execute Change Order No. 1 for the Rue Street Lift Station Electrical and Controls Improvements Project.]

FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM F SECOND IT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED, UH, FOR AGENDA.

ADAM F. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? IT'S NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, UH, OPPOSED. MOTION MOTION PASSES. ALRIGHT CITY MANAGER, MAY WE HAVE THE READING ABOUT

[1. Council consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a drinking place in the GC-MD (General Commercial-Multiple Family Dwelling) District for property located at 3035 College Street, Suite A.]

THEM? NUMBER ONE THANK YOU. MAYOR COUNCIL CONSIDERED REQUESTS FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT

[00:30:02]

TO ALLOW DRINKING PLACE IN THE G C M D, WHICH JOAN COMMERCIAL, MULTIPLE FAMILY FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 30 35 COLLEGE STREET SUITE. A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON JUNE 26 2020 DURING THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED 70 TO APPROVE UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. CONSTRUCTION PLANS MUST MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS BY WATER UTILITIES FOR WATER AND SENATORS. SOURCE SERVICES INCLUDED IN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S BACKFLOW PRE TREATMENT AND OUR FOG PROGRAM. TWO FINAL PLANS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE LOCATION OF THE EQUIPMENT THAT WILL BE USED AT THE ESTABLISHMENT. THREE ALL CURRENT FIVE CODES WILL BE APPLIED. I HAVE SAID 2021, INCLUDING POSSIBLE REQUIREMENT OF A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE LICENSE PEACE OFFICER PRESENT ON WEEKNIGHTS AND A MINIMUM OF TWO PRESENT ON WEEKEND NIGHT. AND FIVE SMOKING TO BE APPROVED BY THE FAR MARSHAL, AND THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE WITH THOSE CONDITIONS. OKAY IS THERE A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER ONE? SO MOVE TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS SECOND. IT'S BEEN THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR APPROVAL OF ADAM NUMBER ONE. ANY DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ADAM. NUMBER ONE, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, UH, HE OPPOSED. THE MOTION IS

[2. Council consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Industrial Development Agreement with Linde, Inc. in order to offer economic development incentives for a new industrial project.]

CARRIED CITY MANAGER MAY WE HAVE THE READING OF ADAM? NUMBER TWO? YES COUNCIL CONSIDERED A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER AND TO AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LINDY IN ORDER TO OFFER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES FOR A NEW INDUSTRIAL PROJECT IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION. THERE IS A MOTION FOR ADAM, NUMBER TWO. IS THERE. A MOTION FOR ADAM NUMBER TWO TO APPROVE. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED FOR AUTUMN NUMBER TO ANY DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ITEM NUMBER TWO. PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, UH

[3. Council consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award a contract to ALLCO, LLC, of Beaumont, TX, and execute Change Order No. 1 for the Pine Street 48-Inch Raw Water Line Project.]

, ANY OPPOSED THE MOTION IS CARRIED CITY MANAGER. MAY WE HAVE THE READING ABOUT? UM, NUMBER THREE? YES MA'AM COUNCIL CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TOWARD A CONTRACT TO ALL CO L L C A BEAUMONT, TEXAS, AND EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NUMBER ONE FOR THE PINE STREET FOR 48 INCH EXCUSE ME WATERLINE PROJECT AND THE FOREIGN FUNDING SOURCES TO THE CAPITAL PROGRAM AND SEE THE CDBG JELLO AND RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION. IS THERE A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER THREE? MOVE TO APPROVE. SECOND. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED FOR OUT OF APPROVAL OF ADAM. NUMBER THREE. ANY DISCUSSION YES, COUNCILMAN NEIL. MR MANAGER.

WHAT ARE WE ACTUALLY DOING HERE? HAVING A HARD TIME TO FOLLOW AND WHAT'S TAKING PLACE ON THIS? OKAY? THANK YOU, MOLLY. GOOD AFTERNOON. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING TODAY THE BIDS WERE RECEIVED FOR THE PROJECT. AND THEY BOTH BIDS CAME IN SIGNIFICANTLY OVER BUDGET. AND SO WE THEN ENTERED INTO A VALUE ENGINEERING PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO SEE WHERE WE WERE GOING TO BE ABLE TO FIND ANY COST SAVINGS IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. AND SO BECAUSE IT WAS DIFFICULT IN GOOD CONSCIENCE TO BRING A PROJECT BEFORE YOU, UH, FOR EXCEEDED OUR THE BUDGET AND THE FUNDING THAT WE HAD AVAILABLE, SO WE MET WITH AL KO , WHO WAS THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER AS WELL AS FIRST WE WORKED WITH OUR CONSULTANT ENGINEER FREESE AND NICHOLS. AND EVALUATED THE TWO AREAS WHERE THE PROJECT CAME IN OVER BUDGET . AND SO THE ENGINEER PROVIDED A RECOMMENDATION REVIEW THAT RECOMMENDATION WITH ALCO. AND SO THAT IS THE CHANGE ORDER NUMBER ONE, REDUCING THE AMOUNT BY $8.9 MILLION. AND SO WHAT DO YOU REMOVING FOR? THE 8.9 MILLION. JUST THE 42 INCH RESILIENCY. 11 WE'RE REMOVING THE RESILIENCY LINE. AND SO THAT DID GIVE US SOME COST SAVINGS. WE ALSO CHANGED THE PIPE MATERIAL. SO ORIGINALLY IT WAS BID WITH A BAR RAP STEEL PIPE WITH A ALTERNATE PIPE MATERIAL CALLED A STEEL CYLINDER PIPE THAT'S GOT THE CONCRETE MORTAR. AROUND IT. BOTH

[00:35:01]

OF THOSE CAME IN EXCESSIVELY OVER BUDGET. THERE IS A NEW PIPE MATERIAL. IT'S NEW TO WATER IS OFTEN USED FOR SEWER. THE MANUFACTURER NOW IS USING IT FOR WATER APPLICATIONS WHERE THE PRESSURES ARE LOWER. AND SO IT'S A FIBERGLASS PIPE AND SO BY SWITCHING TO THAT PIPE MATERIAL THE EXCAVATION TRENCH CAN NOW BE NARROWER BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE WELDERS IN THE HOLE, AND THEY'RE ALSO ABLE TO JUST PUSH ON THE JOINTS INSTEAD OF HAVING THE WELDED TOGETHER SO THEIR PRODUCTION IS FASTER. AND SO THAT SAVED US IN EXCAVATION. WE ALSO DON'T HAVE TO DIG AS DEEP AND SO THAT SAVED US MATERIAL COSTS AND THEN ALSO THE PAVEMENT SECTION BECAUSE AS WE FINISH WITH INSTALLING THE WATERLAND. WE'RE REDOING THE ROAD. AND SO WE INCORPORATED THE USE OF A GEO TEXTILE FABRIC, WHICH ALLOWED US TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO THE PAVEMENT SECTION TO GET THE SAME PERFORMANCE AT A LOWER COST. SO BOTH ALL THOSE THREE ITEMS TOGETHER OR WHAT LED TO THIS COST SAVINGS GO TO THE VE EXERCISES WITH BOTH OF THESE CONTRACTORS. OR JUST ONE. ALLCO UM, SORRY. FREEZER NICHOLS IS THE ONE WHO COORDINATED THEMSELVES EFFORTS AND SO WE CAN GET CONFIRMATION THAT RIGHT TECH AND, UH OKAY, WE'RE INVOLVED IN THOSE NEGOTIATIONS, BUT RATE TAX BID WAS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER. AND AS WE WORKED IN THE VALUE ENGINEERING, THEY WERE STILL GOING TO BE THE HIGHER BID. I GUESS MY LAST QUESTION IS MORE FOR LEGAL. CAN YOU VE OUT MORE THAN A CERTAIN VALUE WITHOUT PUTTING IT BACK OUT FOR BID FOR COMPETITIVE BID. YES WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING VALUE ENGINEERING PREFERENCES YOU CAN IN SOME CASES WHEN YOU HAVE ONLY ONE BITTER. YOU CAN GO DIRECTLY INTO THAT PROCESS. BUT WHEN WHAT THEY DID THE COMPARISON, THE OTHER BIDDER WOULD HAVE STILL BEEN HIGHER, SO ALCOHOL IS STILL THE LOWEST BIDDER. BUT LIKE SHE SAID, WE CAN CONFIRM WITH OUR ENGINEERING COMPANY WHO WE CONTACTED WITH BOTH COMPANIES WERE GIVEN A CHANCE. TO GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS. SO ARE WE UNDER ATTACK ON FRAME ON THIS PROJECT? YES SIR. WE ARE ON A 90 DAY CLOCK. I'M SORRY, 60 DAY CLOCK FROM THE DATE THAT BIDS WERE OPENED AND THAT 60 DAY CLOCK EXPIRES NEXT WEDNESDAY. AND ALSO TOO WE ARE ON A CLOCK FOR THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE THE GRANT FROM THE G L O ALSO HAS AN WHERE WE'RE GETTING CLOSE ON THE EXPLORATION OF WHEN THAT MONEY HAS TO BE SPENT FOR A TIMELINE PURPOSES COUNCIL COULD HAVE STAFF COULD HAVE RECOMMENDED JUST AWARDING THE CONTRACTOR ALCO, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THEY COULD HAVE UNDERBID THE CONTRACTOR MATERIAL CHANGES AND THEN CAME BACK TO YOU SEPARATELY WITH A CHANGE ORDER, HOWEVER, IS MOLLY MENTIONED THEY RECOGNIZED THAT THERE WAS SOME OPPORTUNITY TO GET COST REDUCTION PRIOR TO THE START OF THE CONTRACT, WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR REDUCTION IN BOTH TIME PRODUCTION AND MATERIALS AS WELL. AND SO THEY STARTED THE VALUE ENGINEERING PROCESS BEFORE THE CONTRACT WAS AWARDED TO BRING TO COUNSEL REDUCTION IN PRICE DOESN'T MEAN THAT THEY WON'T COME BACK WITH ADDITIONAL CHANGE ORDERS TO LOWER OR INCREASE THE PRICE. IT JUST MEANS THAT THE OUTSET THAT THE PRICE IS LOWER. AND CLOSER TO WHAT WE ESTIMATED IT COULD BE. THANK YOU. BY COUNCILMAN FELL. SHAW ALI. I'M ASSUMING THAT THIS CHANGE OF PRODUCT ON THE PIPE ITSELF WE'RE CONFIDENT THAT THIS WILL NOT COME BACK.

YEARS TO COME AND CREATE A REGRET ON OUR PART. NO, SIR. THAT WAS ONE OF THE ONE OF THE SERIOUS CONCERNS THAT WE HAD IN WHY WE HAD INITIALLY GONE WITH THE STEEL PIPES BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO DIG THAT BACK UP. UM BUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT ITSELF WITH THE FIBERGLASS PIPE SPIRAL WELL PIPE AND WE ARE ALSO WORKING WITH THE CONSULTANT IN OUR CITY STAFF TO BE VERY DETAILED IN THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS OF THAT AS WELL TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO NOT HAVE TO, UH, THAT WE HAVE THE FULL CONFIDENCE IN THIS PIPE. AND WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE 42 INCH. WHAT DOES THAT DO TO US LATER? THE BECAUSE THEY WERE BOTH GOING TO BE IN THAT SECTION OF PAD STREET, WE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE TO GO BACK INTO PINE STREET TO BUILD THAT SECTION. HOWEVER WE RECOGNIZE THAT WE'VE GOT TO GET WE HAVE TO GET THIS RAW WATER LINE IN IN THE GROUND. SO WE IN TALKING WITH THE CONTRACTORS. THEY WERE COMFORTABLE THAT WITH THE ALIGNMENT THAT WE HAVE THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO EXCAVATE SAFELY , NOT DISTURB THE RAW WATER LINE AND BUILD THE 42 INCH RESILIENCY , LAN. THANK YOU, MAYOR. HERE YES, COUNCILMAN GET I AM A UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS 48 AND THROW WATER LINE PROJECT IS NECESSITATED BECAUSE WE'RE LOCATING ARE PUMPING STATION. IS THAT CORRECT? WE'RE BUILDING THE ONE THAT CALL YOUR SCARY CORRECT . THIS LINE WILL CONNECT. CALL US VERY PUMP STATION TO THE PAN STREET WATER PLANT. YEAH IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WAS PRIMARILY BEING PAID FOR BY FEMA FUNDS. IS THAT NOT TRUE? IT'S

[00:40:05]

HARVEY. ROUND ONE FUNDING. UH FROM THE IT'S BEEN MANAGED BY THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE. HMM.

HOW MUCH HOW MUCH IS FROM THE CAPITAL PROGRAM. AND HOW MUCH IS FROM THE, UH JLO GLOS AWARD AMOUNT WAS 9.81 MILLION, AND THE BALANCE IS COMING FROM THE CAPITAL PROGRAM. HMM AND ANOTHER SORRY I NEGLECTED TO MENTION THERE ANOTHER ASPECT OF THE COST SAVINGS IS WE REDUCE, WE REMOVED A PORTION OF THE WATERLINE THAT'S WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE COLLIERS FAIRY PUMP STATION PROJECT, AND SO THAT WILL BE BUILT. SO YOU'LL SEE A CHANGE ORDER COMING TO THE COURAGE, VERY PUMP STATION PROJECT. AND IN MY OPINION, IT PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN PART OF THAT PROJECT ORIGINALLY, BUT THAT WILL GET THE DISCHARGE LINE FROM THE PUMP STATION PAST THE PAST THE ACCESS DRIVE INTO THE PUMP STATION SITE, SO THAT WAS THE OTHER COST SAVINGS THAT WE HAD.

WE WERE REMOVED ABOUT. UM. ABOUT 500 FT OF THIS SO THAT THE PUMP STATION PAYS ENTIRELY FOR EVERYTHING WITHIN THE PUMP STATION FOOTPRINT AND THEN THE WATERLINE PROJECT PAYS FOR THE REMAINDER COMING DOWN PANTS STREET. DID I JUST UNDERSTAND YOU TO SAY THAT ABOUT 20 MILLION OF THIS IS COMING FROM THE CAPITAL PROGRAM AND 9 MILLION FROM THE JLO. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HAD WE AWARDED IT AT THE ORIGINAL AWARD AMOUNT, SO WE'RE WE VALUE ENGINEERED IT DOWN TO 20 MILLION. SO THERE'S ABOUT A LITTLE OVER 10 MILLION THAT'S COMING FROM THE CAPITAL PROGRAM.

10 MILLION FROM THE CAPITAL PROGRAM. YES, SIR. SO I'M JUST GOING TO SAY THIS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN AGAINST THIS PROJECT FROM THE BEGINNING. I THINK I WAS THE ONLY ONE VOTED AGAINST IT. UM THIS ALL STEMS FROM HARVEY KNOCKING OUT OUR WATER SUPPLY FOR ABOUT 12 DAYS AND ARE.

EXISTING PUBLIC STATION, THE ONE WE'RE USING TODAY. UH WAS OVERRUN WITH FLOODWATER. WE WERE GIVEN MONEY BY FEMA. TO HELP HARDEN AND STRENGTHEN OUR CITY FROM THINGS LIKE THIS HAPPENING IN THE FUTURE. BUT THE REALITY IS THAT WE WERE ABLE TO GET THAT PUMP STATION BACK UP AND RUNNING AND IN THIS IS GOOD AND SNOOP CONDITION. YEAH RELATIVELY SOON IN FOR LESS THAN A MILLION DOLLARS, AND IT TOOK A 500 YEAR FLOOD TO KNOCK IT OUT. WE'RE SPENDING A TON OF MONEY ON REDUNDANCY HERE. AND, UM I HAD A PROBLEM WITH IT, THEN. I CONTINUE TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT. AND NOW THAT WE CAN SEE WE'RE INTO VALUE ENGINEERING, WHICH THAT THAT TURNED BY ITSELF CONCERNS ME, SO YOUR HEAD IS WHAT IT IS. COUNCILMAN TURNER. MOLLY. WE'RE SPENDING UH, QUITE A BIT OF TIME TALKING ABOUT THIS PROJECT, BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE CITIZENS OF BOMA UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE TRULY TALKING ABOUT. CAN YOU SPEAK TO THE BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT? THE BENEFIT FROM THE STAFF PLAN POINT OF WHY WE'RE EVEN DISCUSSING THIS PROJECT. ABSOLUTELY SO THE NEW COLLIERS VERY RAW WATER PUMP STATION WILL IMPROVE OUR RESILIENCY IN THE EVENT OF A CATASTROPHIC FLOOD. AS COUNCILMAN GETS MENTIONED, HARVEY DID INUNDATE THE STATION . WE WERE VERY FORTUNATE THAT IT SUFFERED THE LIMITED DAMAGES THAT IT DID. THE COLORS. THE LAWSUITS PUMP STATION, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT FLOODED PUMPS TO A WATER LINE THAT RUNS INSIDE OF LAWSON'S CANAL, AND THAT CANAL IT IS WITHIN A SENSITIVE WETLAND AREA, AND SO TOO MR CRABS COMMENT ABOUT CONSTRUCTING THE DISCHARGE LINE ALONG THAT CANAL. JUST WE'RE START. WE STARTED THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING PROCESS ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO. WE'RE ANTICIPATING TO GO ABOUT ANOTHER 18 MONTHS JUST FOR PERMITTING BEFORE WE CAN GO IN AND MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THAT WATERLINE, SO IT'S A WATER LINE THAT WE DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO ITS VERY EXPENSIVE. IT'S ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE. AND SO IT IS. A PLACE WHERE WE JUST DO NOT HAVE RULES ILL RESILIENCY TO A DISASTER BY HAVING THE NEW PUMP STATION WE HAVE THE NEW WATERLINE DOWN PUNCH STREET. HEAVEN FORBID WE EVER HAVE TO ENTER THAT LINE FOR ANY REASON, BUT IT'S IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION BECAUSE IT'S DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET AND MAKE ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS. BUT ALSO TOO WE HAVE TWO WAYS TO GET WATER. FROM THE NATURE'S RIVER TO THE PAN STREET WATER PLANT WHERE WE TREAT THAT WATER SO ONCE THE NEW PUMP STATION IS BUILT, THE WATERLINE GOES INTO SERVICE. WE CAN TAKE THE OLD EXISTING PUMP STATION AND THAT WATERLINE OUT OF SERVICE MAKE THE NECESSARY REPAIRS

[00:45:04]

IMPROVEMENTS. WHATEVER NEEDS TO HAPPEN THERE. AND THEN THAT WAY WE CAN. WE'RE DOING THE BEST WE CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN ALWAYS PUMP WATER. TO THE PAD STREET TREATMENT PLANT, WHICH, UH, NORMAL OPERATIONS SERVES ANYWHERE FROM 70 TO 100% OF THE CITY'S WATER TO THE CITIZENS. SO BASED UPON WHAT YOU JUST SAID FROM STEP STANDPOINTS IS A GOOD CONTINGENCY TO BE PUT IN PLACE.

JUST IN CASE WE EXPERIENCE SOMETHING THAT WE EXPERIENCED IN THE PAST WHEN WE WERE OUT OF WATER DURING THE STORM. CORRECT CORRECT. AND, YOU KNOW, EVERY STORM IS DIFFERENT. YOU KNOW, WE WERE VERY DIFFICULT TO PREDICT WHAT COULD HAPPEN. BUT THIS WAY WE ARE IN HIS RESILIENT POSITION AS WE CAN BE. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ITEM NUMBER THREE.

PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE AYE, ANY OPPOSED OPPOSED? THE MOTION IS CARRIED CITY MANAGER,

[4. Council consider a resolution accepting payment in the amount of $540.00 for the principal of a litter lien and the lien assessment fee for lien filed on August 10, 2020 on property legally described as Forrest L39 B8 (3494 Magnolia Ave.), and payment in the amount of $3,460.00 for unpaid weed abatement charges, waiving litter lien interest in the amount of $141.09, and waiving weed abatement charges in the amount of $4,373.75.]

RIGHT? WE HAVE THE READING ABOUT, UM, NUMBER FOUR, PLEASE. COUNCIL CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $540 FOR THE PRINCIPAL, VERY LITERALLY AND ELAINE ASSESSMENT THIEF EARLENE FILED ON AUGUST 10TH 10TH 2020 ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOREST 39 B EIGHT, WHICH IS 34 94, MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND PAYMENT AND DEMAND OF $3460 FOR UNPAID WE DEBATE MINT CHARGES. WAVING LITERALLY LEAN, INTERESTING AMOUNT OF $141.09 AND WAVING WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES IN THE AMOUNT OF 377,075 CENTS AND STAFF. IT'S RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION. IS THERE A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER FOUR? YEAH. SO MOVE FOR APPROVAL. SECOND. IT'S BEEN MOVED BY COUNCILMAN UH, HARBOR AND SAMUEL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN FELL. SHAW ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ADAM NUMBER FOUR, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, ANY OPPOSED MOTION IS CARRIED. THIS CONCLUDES THE REGULAR AGENDA. CITY MANAGER. WOULD YOU

[ City Council, after conducting a public hearing, consider an ordinance to declare the following 46 structures to be unsafe structures and order the owners to raze the said structures within 10 days. If the property owner fails to comply within 10 days, staff is requesting City Council authorization to demolish these structures without further notification to the property owner or City Council action. Additionally, if the property owner of a structure requests and is authorized by City Council to enroll in a work program, all delinquent taxes shall be paid in full, or a payment plan shall be established prior to enrollment in the work program. Enrollment in the work program shall occur within 10 days after the effective date of this ordinance.]